I contemplate on how the developed society works. On why people eat food from outside all the time, and home-kitchens are more for specials with guests / traditional fests. On why, inspite of being natural vegetarians, humans chug in huge chunks of meat, caffeine and sometimes even energy drinks in a day. On why popping-in supplements and pills is okay if it makes you look and feel "better". And I see why, but also ask why not?
On average we live 70years of what I can say productive lives, after which much of it is truly retired for most, where they cannot contribute. Even of these 70, most people are employed to contribute to the mainstream from the ages of 22 to around 60, say 40 years. A diet of meat and caffeine keeps us aggressive, alert and arguably, more productive, than one that lacks it. On average, if you just look at an 8hr workday, a person on such a diet is likely to contribute more. But more if work involves physical labor (laborers) or motivating people (leaders).
As we move to move higher intellect / spiritual roles, a calm environment makes the most difference. Spiked nerves or aggressive/muscular physiques are not really their need or domain, and even works against the balance needed. Most roles in society, I'd say falls in this category: Scientists, medical doctors, scholars and researchers, planners, administrators, even modern IT developers.
But if you feed a soldier on vegetables, you will most likely not get the best out of him.
But controlling diet based on your love, work and leanings, should truly be a personal choice. Although idealistic, a government or spiritual head should not coerce these. Each individual should understand the good and bad effects of his diet on the role he plays for moving society forward, and "eat" accordingly!
On average we live 70years of what I can say productive lives, after which much of it is truly retired for most, where they cannot contribute. Even of these 70, most people are employed to contribute to the mainstream from the ages of 22 to around 60, say 40 years. A diet of meat and caffeine keeps us aggressive, alert and arguably, more productive, than one that lacks it. On average, if you just look at an 8hr workday, a person on such a diet is likely to contribute more. But more if work involves physical labor (laborers) or motivating people (leaders).
As we move to move higher intellect / spiritual roles, a calm environment makes the most difference. Spiked nerves or aggressive/muscular physiques are not really their need or domain, and even works against the balance needed. Most roles in society, I'd say falls in this category: Scientists, medical doctors, scholars and researchers, planners, administrators, even modern IT developers.
But if you feed a soldier on vegetables, you will most likely not get the best out of him.
But controlling diet based on your love, work and leanings, should truly be a personal choice. Although idealistic, a government or spiritual head should not coerce these. Each individual should understand the good and bad effects of his diet on the role he plays for moving society forward, and "eat" accordingly!
No comments:
Post a Comment